Adare vs Crystal Brook
Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Crystal Brook, QLD 4800
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 1, Crystal Brook wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adare | Crystal Brook |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $930K | - |
| Median unit price | $285K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.74% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.66% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +17.6%estimate | +9.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 1,027 | 237 |
Adare vs Crystal Brook: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +9.4% in Crystal Brook, so recent momentum favours Adare, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.
Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 237, roughly 4.3 times the size of Crystal Brook; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Adare for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison