Adare vs Hampden
Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Hampden, QLD 4741
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 2, Hampden wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adare | Hampden |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $930K | - |
| Median unit price | $285K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.74% | 3.71% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.66% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +17.6%estimate | +12.4% |
| 3-year house growth | - | +38.1% |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 0.9% |
| Population | 1,027 | 598 |
Adare vs Hampden: what the numbers say
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.74% in Adare and 3.71% in Hampden, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +12.4% in Hampden, so recent momentum favours Adare, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is the same in both, at 0.9%.
Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 598, larger than Hampden; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Adare for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison