Skip to main content

Adare vs Mount Glorious

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Mount Glorious, QLD 4520

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 5, Mount Glorious wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareMount Glorious
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$685K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%2.86%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%4.43%
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+5.7%
3-year house growth-+9.1%
Vacancy rate0.9%4.8%
Population1,027343

Adare vs Mount Glorious: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $685K in Mount Glorious, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Mount Glorious the pricier one.

On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 2.86% in Mount Glorious, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +5.7% in Mount Glorious, so recent momentum favours Adare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 4.8% in Mount Glorious, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 343, roughly 3.0 times the size of Mount Glorious; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Adare for rental income, Adare for recent price momentum, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison