Skip to main content

Adare vs Sarina

Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs Sarina, QLD 4737

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 3, Sarina wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAdareSarina
Median house price$930K-
Median unit price$285K$550K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.74%5.70%
Gross rental yield (units)5.66%-
1-year house growth+17.6%estimate+13.0%
3-year house growth-+37.3%
Vacancy rate0.9%1.3%
Population1,0275,619

Adare vs Sarina: what the numbers say

For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $550K in Sarina, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and Sarina the pricier one.

On cash flow, Sarina leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.70%, compared with 3.74% in Adare, a gap of 1.96 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +17.6% in Adare (an estimate) and +13.0% in Sarina, so recent momentum favours Adare, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 1.3% in Sarina, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Sarina is the bigger suburb, with a population of 5,619 against 1,027, roughly 5 times the size of Adare; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sarina for rental income, Adare for recent price momentum, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison