Adare vs The Leap
Property investment comparison - Adare, QLD 4343 vs The Leap, QLD 4740
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Adare wins 4, The Leap wins 0. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Adare | The Leap |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $930K | - |
| Median unit price | $285K | $1.5M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.74% | 3.49% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 5.66% | 1.89% |
| 1-year house growth | +17.6%estimate | - |
| 3-year house growth | - | - |
| Vacancy rate | 0.9% | 1.1% |
| Population | 1,027 | 664 |
Adare vs The Leap: what the numbers say
For units, Adare sits at a median of $285K against $1.5M in The Leap, which makes Adare the more affordable unit market and The Leap the pricier one.
On cash flow, Adare leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.74%, compared with 3.49% in The Leap, a gap of 0.25 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Adare and 1.1% in The Leap, so landlords in Adare face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Adare is the bigger suburb, with a population of 1,027 against 664, larger than The Leap; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Adare for rental income, Adare for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison