Skip to main content

Aintree vs Anakie

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Anakie, VIC 3213

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Anakie wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeAnakie
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$735K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.10%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%3.60%
1-year house growth+1.1%+1.1%
3-year house growth-3.9%+1.4%
Vacancy rate14.5%4.6%
Population7,982734

Aintree vs Anakie: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $735K in Anakie, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Anakie the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.10% in Anakie, a gap of 0.88 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in both suburbs.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Anakie houses +1.4%, so Anakie has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 4.6% in Anakie and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Anakie face less competition for tenants.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 734, roughly 11 times the size of Anakie; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Anakie for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison