Aintree vs Balmoral
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Balmoral, VIC 3407
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Balmoral wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Balmoral |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $280K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 5.55% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 7.13% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | -3.2% |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | - |
| Population | 7,982 | 281 |
Aintree vs Balmoral: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $280K in Balmoral, which makes Balmoral the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
On cash flow, Balmoral leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.55%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 1.57 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and -3.2% in Balmoral, so recent momentum favours Aintree, while Balmoral went backwards.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 281, roughly 28 times the size of Balmoral; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Balmoral for rental income, Aintree for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison