Skip to main content

Aintree vs Barnawartha

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Barnawartha, VIC 3688

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Barnawartha wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeBarnawartha
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$365K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.75%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%4.62%
1-year house growth+1.1%+6.7%
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%2.5%
Population7,982987

Aintree vs Barnawartha: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $365K in Barnawartha, which makes Barnawartha the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.75% in Barnawartha, a gap of 0.23 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +6.7% in Barnawartha, so recent momentum favours Barnawartha, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 2.5% in Barnawartha and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Barnawartha face less competition for tenants.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 987, roughly 8 times the size of Barnawartha; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Barnawartha for recent price momentum, Barnawartha for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison