Aintree vs Bayles
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Bayles, VIC 3981
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Bayles wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Bayles |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $525K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.27% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 3.39% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | +9.7% |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 4.7% |
| Population | 7,982 | 445 |
Aintree vs Bayles: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $525K in Bayles, which makes Bayles the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.27% in Bayles, a gap of 1.71 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +9.7% in Bayles, so recent momentum favours Bayles, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Rental vacancy is 4.7% in Bayles and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Bayles face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 445, roughly 18 times the size of Bayles; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Bayles for recent price momentum, Bayles for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison