Skip to main content

Aintree vs Bonbeach

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Bonbeach, VIC 3196

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Bonbeach wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeBonbeach
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$755K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.20%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%4.15%
1-year house growth+1.1%+7.5%estimate
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%1.4%
Population7,9826,855

Aintree vs Bonbeach: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $755K in Bonbeach, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Bonbeach the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.20% in Bonbeach, a gap of 0.78 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +7.5% in Bonbeach (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Bonbeach, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Bonbeach and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Bonbeach face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 6,855, larger than Bonbeach; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Bonbeach for recent price momentum, Bonbeach for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison
Aintree vs Bonbeach: Property Investment Comparison (2026)