Skip to main content

Aintree vs Clunes

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Clunes, VIC 3370

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Clunes wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeClunes
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$440K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%-
1-year house growth+1.1%+9.1%
3-year house growth-3.9%+2.0%
Vacancy rate14.5%0.7%
Population7,9821,844

Aintree vs Clunes: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $440K in Clunes, which makes Clunes the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +9.1% in Clunes, so recent momentum favours Clunes, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Clunes houses +2.0%, so Clunes has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Clunes and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Clunes face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,844, roughly 4.3 times the size of Clunes; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Clunes for recent price momentum, Clunes for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison