Aintree vs Coomboona
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Coomboona, VIC 3629
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Coomboona wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Coomboona |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 4.38% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 2.9% |
| Population | 7,982 | 134 |
Aintree vs Coomboona: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Coomboona leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.38%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 0.40 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 2.9% in Coomboona and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Coomboona face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 134, roughly 60 times the size of Coomboona; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Coomboona for rental income, Coomboona for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison