Skip to main content

Aintree vs Deanside

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Deanside, VIC 3336

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Deanside wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeDeanside
Median house price$705K$705K
Median unit price$575K$535K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%4.34%
1-year house growth+1.1%+0.4%
3-year house growth-3.9%+7.8%
Vacancy rate14.5%14.3%
Population7,982654

Aintree vs Deanside: what the numbers say

Houses cost about the same in both suburbs: the median house price is $705K in Aintree and $705K in Deanside.

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $535K in Deanside, which makes Deanside the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +0.4% in Deanside, so recent momentum favours Aintree, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Deanside houses +7.8%, so Deanside has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 14.3% in Deanside and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Deanside face less competition for tenants.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 654, roughly 12 times the size of Deanside; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for recent price momentum, Deanside for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison