Aintree vs Dunkeld
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Dunkeld, VIC 3294
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Dunkeld wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Dunkeld |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 4.94% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.82% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | -4.1%estimate |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 0.9% |
| Population | 7,982 | 688 |
Aintree vs Dunkeld: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Dunkeld leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.94%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 0.96 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and -4.1% in Dunkeld (an estimate), so recent momentum favours Aintree, while Dunkeld went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Dunkeld and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Dunkeld face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 688, roughly 12 times the size of Dunkeld; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Dunkeld for rental income, Aintree for recent price momentum, Dunkeld for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison