Aintree vs Durham Lead
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Durham Lead, VIC 3352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Durham Lead wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Durham Lead |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $625K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 3.30% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.90% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 1.8% |
| Population | 7,982 | 408 |
Aintree vs Durham Lead: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $625K in Durham Lead, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Durham Lead the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.30% in Durham Lead, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Durham Lead and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Durham Lead face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 408, roughly 20 times the size of Durham Lead; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Durham Lead for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison