Skip to main content

Aintree vs Fryerstown

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Fryerstown, VIC 3451

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Fryerstown wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeFryerstown
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$650K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%2.40%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%3.21%
1-year house growth+1.1%+4.5%
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%1.5%
Population7,982232

Aintree vs Fryerstown: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $650K in Fryerstown, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Fryerstown the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.40% in Fryerstown, a gap of 1.58 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +4.5% in Fryerstown, so recent momentum favours Fryerstown, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.5% in Fryerstown and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Fryerstown face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 232, roughly 34 times the size of Fryerstown; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Fryerstown for recent price momentum, Fryerstown for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison