Skip to main content

Aintree vs Gardenvale

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Gardenvale, VIC 3185

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 3, Gardenvale wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeGardenvale
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$480K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%2.31%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%4.80%
1-year house growth+1.1%-0.8%
3-year house growth-3.9%-7.4%
Vacancy rate14.5%0.9%
Population7,9821,019

Aintree vs Gardenvale: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $480K in Gardenvale, which makes Gardenvale the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.31% in Gardenvale, a gap of 1.67 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and -0.8% in Gardenvale, so recent momentum favours Aintree, while Gardenvale went backwards.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Gardenvale houses -7.4%, so Aintree has compounded faster than Gardenvale over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Gardenvale and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Gardenvale face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,019, roughly 8 times the size of Gardenvale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Aintree for recent price momentum, Gardenvale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison