Aintree vs Glen Park
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Glen Park, VIC 3352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Glen Park wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Glen Park |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 1.7% |
| Population | 7,982 | 110 |
Aintree vs Glen Park: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Glen Park and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Glen Park face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 110, roughly 73 times the size of Glen Park; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Glen Park for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison