Aintree vs Gormandale
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Gormandale, VIC 3873
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Gormandale wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Gormandale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $450K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 3.60% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 5.80% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | +7.2% |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | - |
| Population | 7,982 | 324 |
Aintree vs Gormandale: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $450K in Gormandale, which makes Gormandale the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.60% in Gormandale, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +7.2% in Gormandale, so recent momentum favours Gormandale, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 324, roughly 25 times the size of Gormandale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Gormandale for recent price momentum. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison