Aintree vs Granite Rock
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Granite Rock, VIC 3875
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Granite Rock wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Granite Rock |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $540K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 3.60% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 3.89% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 6.7% |
| Population | 7,982 | 261 |
Aintree vs Granite Rock: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $540K in Granite Rock, which makes Granite Rock the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.60% in Granite Rock, a gap of 0.38 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 6.7% in Granite Rock and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Granite Rock face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 261, roughly 31 times the size of Granite Rock; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Granite Rock for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison