Aintree vs Green Gully
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Green Gully, VIC 3462
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 3, Green Gully wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Green Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $725K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 5.56% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.00% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 15.9% |
| Population | 7,982 | 71 |
Aintree vs Green Gully: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $725K in Green Gully, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Green Gully the pricier one.
On cash flow, Green Gully leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 5.56%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 1.58 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 14.5% in Aintree and 15.9% in Green Gully, so landlords in Aintree face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 71, roughly 112 times the size of Green Gully; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Green Gully for rental income, Aintree for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison