Skip to main content

Aintree vs Haddon

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Haddon, VIC 3351

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 3, Haddon wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeHaddon
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$585K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%2.74%
1-year house growth+1.1%+3.3%
3-year house growth-3.9%-14.0%
Vacancy rate14.5%6.8%
Population7,9821,276

Aintree vs Haddon: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $585K in Haddon, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Haddon the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.30% in Haddon, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +3.3% in Haddon, so recent momentum favours Haddon, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Haddon houses -14.0%, so Aintree has compounded faster than Haddon over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 6.8% in Haddon and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Haddon face less competition for tenants.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,276, roughly 6 times the size of Haddon; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Haddon for recent price momentum, Haddon for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison