Aintree vs Howes Creek
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Howes Creek, VIC 3723
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Howes Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Howes Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | -11.7% |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 13.2% |
| Population | 7,982 | 67 |
Aintree vs Howes Creek: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.70% in Howes Creek, a gap of 1.28 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and -11.7% in Howes Creek, so recent momentum favours Aintree, while Howes Creek went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 13.2% in Howes Creek and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Howes Creek face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 67, roughly 119 times the size of Howes Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Aintree for recent price momentum, Howes Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison