Aintree vs Katandra West
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Katandra West, VIC 3634
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Katandra West wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Katandra West |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $595K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.24% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 7.06% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 4.0% |
| Population | 7,982 | 492 |
Aintree vs Katandra West: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $595K in Katandra West, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Katandra West the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.24% in Katandra West, a gap of 1.74 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 4.0% in Katandra West and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Katandra West face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 492, roughly 16 times the size of Katandra West; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Katandra West for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison