Skip to main content

Aintree vs Korumburra South

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Korumburra South, VIC 3950

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Korumburra South wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeKorumburra South
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$460K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%2.94%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%4.17%
1-year house growth+1.1%+5.5%
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%0.4%
Population7,982114

Aintree vs Korumburra South: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $460K in Korumburra South, which makes Korumburra South the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.94% in Korumburra South, a gap of 1.04 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +5.5% in Korumburra South, so recent momentum favours Korumburra South, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 0.4% in Korumburra South and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Korumburra South face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 114, roughly 70 times the size of Korumburra South; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Korumburra South for recent price momentum, Korumburra South for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison