Aintree vs Ladys Pass
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Ladys Pass, VIC 3523
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Ladys Pass wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Ladys Pass |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $655K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 3.10% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 1.9% |
| Population | 7,982 | 118 |
Aintree vs Ladys Pass: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $655K in Ladys Pass, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Ladys Pass the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Ladys Pass and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Ladys Pass face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 118, roughly 68 times the size of Ladys Pass; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Ladys Pass for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison