Aintree vs Lake Lonsdale
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Lake Lonsdale, VIC 3381
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Lake Lonsdale wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Lake Lonsdale |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 6.4% |
| Population | 7,982 | 58 |
Aintree vs Lake Lonsdale: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 6.4% in Lake Lonsdale and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Lake Lonsdale face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 58, roughly 138 times the size of Lake Lonsdale; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lake Lonsdale for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison