Aintree vs Lima East
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Lima East, VIC 3673
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Lima East wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Lima East |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $425K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 4.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.06% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 2.9% |
| Population | 7,982 | 165 |
Aintree vs Lima East: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $425K in Lima East, which makes Lima East the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.98% in Aintree and 4.00% in Lima East, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Rental vacancy is 2.9% in Lima East and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Lima East face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 165, roughly 48 times the size of Lima East; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lima East for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison