Skip to main content

Aintree vs Lockington

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Lockington, VIC 3563

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Lockington wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeLockington
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$360K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.30%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%5.98%
1-year house growth+1.1%+5.2%
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%1.4%
Population7,982850

Aintree vs Lockington: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $360K in Lockington, which makes Lockington the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.30% in Lockington, a gap of 0.68 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +5.2% in Lockington, so recent momentum favours Lockington, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 1.4% in Lockington and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Lockington face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 850, roughly 9 times the size of Lockington; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Lockington for recent price momentum, Lockington for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison