Aintree vs Longford
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Longford, VIC 3851
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Longford wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Longford |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $435K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.39% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | +4.6% |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | +8.3% |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 3.0% |
| Population | 7,982 | 1,489 |
Aintree vs Longford: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $435K in Longford, which makes Longford the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +4.6% in Longford, so recent momentum favours Longford, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Longford houses +8.3%, so Longford has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 3.0% in Longford and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Longford face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,489, roughly 5 times the size of Longford; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Longford for recent price momentum, Longford for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison