Skip to main content

Aintree vs Longwood

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Longwood, VIC 3665

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Longwood wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeLongwood
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$335K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.23%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%4.40%
1-year house growth+1.1%+6.8%
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%6.2%
Population7,982263

Aintree vs Longwood: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $335K in Longwood, which makes Longwood the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.23% in Longwood, a gap of 0.75 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +6.8% in Longwood, so recent momentum favours Longwood, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 6.2% in Longwood and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Longwood face less competition for tenants.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 263, roughly 30 times the size of Longwood; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Longwood for recent price momentum, Longwood for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison