Aintree vs Lucknow
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Lucknow, VIC 3875
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Lucknow wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Lucknow |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 6.38% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | +14.3% |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | +24.9% |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 6.5% |
| Population | 7,982 | 1,439 |
Aintree vs Lucknow: what the numbers say
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +14.3% in Lucknow, so recent momentum favours Lucknow, although both suburbs recorded growth.
Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Lucknow houses +24.9%, so Lucknow has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.
Rental vacancy is 6.5% in Lucknow and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Lucknow face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,439, roughly 6 times the size of Lucknow; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Lucknow for recent price momentum, Lucknow for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison