Skip to main content

Aintree vs Macclesfield

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Macclesfield, VIC 3782

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 3, Macclesfield wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeMacclesfield
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$965K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%1.65%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%3.31%
1-year house growth+1.1%+3.0%
3-year house growth-3.9%-4.7%
Vacancy rate14.5%5.3%
Population7,982878

Aintree vs Macclesfield: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $965K in Macclesfield, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Macclesfield the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 1.65% in Macclesfield, a gap of 2.33 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +3.0% in Macclesfield, so recent momentum favours Macclesfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Macclesfield houses -4.7%, so Aintree has compounded faster than Macclesfield over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 5.3% in Macclesfield and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Macclesfield face less competition for tenants.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 878, roughly 9 times the size of Macclesfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Macclesfield for recent price momentum, Macclesfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison