Aintree vs Macorna North
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Macorna North, VIC 3568
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Macorna North wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Macorna North |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 4.17% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 3.1% |
| Population | 7,982 | 31 |
Aintree vs Macorna North: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Macorna North leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.17%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 0.19 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 3.1% in Macorna North and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Macorna North face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 31, roughly 257 times the size of Macorna North; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Macorna North for rental income, Macorna North for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison