Skip to main content

Aintree vs Mansfield

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Mansfield, VIC 3722

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Mansfield wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeMansfield
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$605K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%4.71%
1-year house growth+1.1%+1.3%
3-year house growth-3.9%-9.3%
Vacancy rate14.5%0.9%
Population7,9825,541

Aintree vs Mansfield: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $605K in Mansfield, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Mansfield the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +1.3% in Mansfield, so recent momentum favours Mansfield, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Mansfield houses -9.3%, so Aintree has compounded faster than Mansfield over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Mansfield and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Mansfield face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 5,541, larger than Mansfield; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Mansfield for recent price momentum, Mansfield for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison