Aintree vs Marcus Hill
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Marcus Hill, VIC 3222
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Marcus Hill wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Marcus Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 1.63% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 1.9% |
| Population | 7,982 | 164 |
Aintree vs Marcus Hill: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 1.63% in Marcus Hill, a gap of 2.35 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.9% in Marcus Hill and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Marcus Hill face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 164, roughly 49 times the size of Marcus Hill; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Marcus Hill for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison