Skip to main content

Aintree vs Merrijig

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Merrijig, VIC 3723

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Merrijig wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeMerrijig
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K-
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%1.99%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%-
1-year house growth+1.1%-0.6%
3-year house growth-3.9%-0.9%
Vacancy rate14.5%1.8%
Population7,982721

Aintree vs Merrijig: what the numbers say

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 1.99% in Merrijig, a gap of 1.99 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and -0.6% in Merrijig, so recent momentum favours Aintree, while Merrijig went backwards.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Merrijig houses -0.9%, so Merrijig has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Merrijig and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Merrijig face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 721, roughly 11 times the size of Merrijig; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Aintree for recent price momentum, Merrijig for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison