Aintree vs Mount Camel
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Mount Camel, VIC 3523
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Mount Camel wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Mount Camel |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 1.8% |
| Population | 7,982 | 136 |
Aintree vs Mount Camel: what the numbers say
Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Mount Camel and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Mount Camel face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 136, roughly 59 times the size of Mount Camel; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mount Camel for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison