Aintree vs Mount Doran
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Mount Doran, VIC 3334
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 0, Mount Doran wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Mount Doran |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $150K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 4.00% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 7.87% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | - |
| Population | 7,982 | 118 |
Aintree vs Mount Doran: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $150K in Mount Doran, which makes Mount Doran the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
Gross rental yield on houses is effectively level, at 3.98% in Aintree and 4.00% in Mount Doran, so neither suburb has a cash flow edge on houses.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 118, roughly 68 times the size of Mount Doran; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison