Aintree vs Mount Eccles
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Mount Eccles, VIC 3953
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Mount Eccles wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Mount Eccles |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $600K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 3.54% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 0.7% |
| Population | 7,982 | 139 |
Aintree vs Mount Eccles: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $600K in Mount Eccles, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Mount Eccles the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 0.7% in Mount Eccles and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Mount Eccles face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 139, roughly 57 times the size of Mount Eccles; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Mount Eccles for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison