Aintree vs Mount Egerton
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Mount Egerton, VIC 3352
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Mount Egerton wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Mount Egerton |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $350K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 3.70% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 4.91% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 1.6% |
| Population | 7,982 | 706 |
Aintree vs Mount Egerton: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $350K in Mount Egerton, which makes Mount Egerton the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.70% in Mount Egerton, a gap of 0.28 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 1.6% in Mount Egerton and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Mount Egerton face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 706, roughly 11 times the size of Mount Egerton; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Mount Egerton for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison