Skip to main content

Aintree vs Mount Taylor

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Mount Taylor, VIC 3875

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Mount Taylor wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeMount Taylor
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$390K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%3.01%
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%5.22%
1-year house growth+1.1%+0.0%
3-year house growth-3.9%-
Vacancy rate14.5%5.7%
Population7,982330

Aintree vs Mount Taylor: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $390K in Mount Taylor, which makes Mount Taylor the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 3.01% in Mount Taylor, a gap of 0.97 percentage points.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +0.0% in Mount Taylor, so recent momentum favours Aintree, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Rental vacancy is 5.7% in Mount Taylor and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Mount Taylor face less competition for tenants.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 330, roughly 24 times the size of Mount Taylor; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Aintree for rental income, Aintree for recent price momentum, Mount Taylor for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison