Skip to main content

Aintree vs Olinda

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Olinda, VIC 3788

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Olinda wins 3. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeOlinda
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$1.2M
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%-
1-year house growth+1.1%+5.0%
3-year house growth-3.9%-3.7%
Vacancy rate14.5%1.7%
Population7,9821,773

Aintree vs Olinda: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $1.2M in Olinda, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Olinda the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +5.0% in Olinda, so recent momentum favours Olinda, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Olinda houses -3.7%, so Olinda has compounded faster than Aintree over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.7% in Olinda and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Olinda face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,773, roughly 4.5 times the size of Olinda; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Olinda for recent price momentum, Olinda for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison