Aintree vs Osbornes Flat
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Osbornes Flat, VIC 3691
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Osbornes Flat wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Osbornes Flat |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $625K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.92% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 2.3% |
| Population | 7,982 | 285 |
Aintree vs Osbornes Flat: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $625K in Osbornes Flat, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Osbornes Flat the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 2.3% in Osbornes Flat and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Osbornes Flat face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 285, roughly 28 times the size of Osbornes Flat; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Osbornes Flat for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison