Aintree vs Pakenham Upper
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Pakenham Upper, VIC 3810
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 3, Pakenham Upper wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Pakenham Upper |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $1.3M |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 1.97% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.11% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 6.7% |
| Population | 7,982 | 1,196 |
Aintree vs Pakenham Upper: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $1.3M in Pakenham Upper, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Pakenham Upper the pricier one.
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 1.97% in Pakenham Upper, a gap of 2.01 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 6.7% in Pakenham Upper and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Pakenham Upper face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,196, roughly 7 times the size of Pakenham Upper; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Pakenham Upper for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Pakenham Upper, VIC 3810
Open Pakenham Upper suburb profileRecent sales in Pakenham Upper
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison