Aintree vs Perry Bridge
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Perry Bridge, VIC 3862
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Perry Bridge wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Perry Bridge |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $665K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 4.37% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.49% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 0.8% |
| Population | 7,982 | 72 |
Aintree vs Perry Bridge: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $665K in Perry Bridge, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Perry Bridge the pricier one.
On cash flow, Perry Bridge leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 4.37%, compared with 3.98% in Aintree, a gap of 0.39 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 0.8% in Perry Bridge and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Perry Bridge face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 72, roughly 111 times the size of Perry Bridge; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Perry Bridge for rental income, Perry Bridge for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison