Aintree vs Pheasant Creek
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Pheasant Creek, VIC 3757
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Pheasant Creek wins 2. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Pheasant Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $650K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | - |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 3.68% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 1.1% |
| Population | 7,982 | 360 |
Aintree vs Pheasant Creek: what the numbers say
For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $650K in Pheasant Creek, which makes Aintree the more affordable unit market and Pheasant Creek the pricier one.
Rental vacancy is 1.1% in Pheasant Creek and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Pheasant Creek face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 360, roughly 22 times the size of Pheasant Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Pheasant Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Full profile
Pheasant Creek, VIC 3757
Open Pheasant Creek suburb profileRecent sales in Pheasant Creek
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison