Aintree vs Raglan
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Raglan, VIC 3373
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Raglan wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Raglan |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | - |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.82% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | - |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | -0.8% |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 0.9% |
| Population | 7,982 | 223 |
Aintree vs Raglan: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.82% in Raglan, a gap of 1.16 percentage points.
Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and -0.8% in Raglan, so recent momentum favours Aintree, while Raglan went backwards.
Rental vacancy is 0.9% in Raglan and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Raglan face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 223, roughly 36 times the size of Raglan; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Aintree for recent price momentum, Raglan for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison