Aintree vs Ross Creek
Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Ross Creek, VIC 3351
Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 2, Ross Creek wins 1. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.
| Metric | Aintree | Ross Creek |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $705K | - |
| Median unit price | $575K | $575K |
| Gross rental yield (houses) | 3.98% | 2.85% |
| Gross rental yield (units) | 2.49% | 2.47% |
| 1-year house growth | +1.1% | - |
| 3-year house growth | -3.9% | - |
| Vacancy rate | 14.5% | 5.1% |
| Population | 7,982 | 1,221 |
Aintree vs Ross Creek: what the numbers say
On cash flow, Aintree leads: houses there return a gross rental yield of 3.98%, compared with 2.85% in Ross Creek, a gap of 1.13 percentage points.
Rental vacancy is 5.1% in Ross Creek and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Ross Creek face less competition for tenants.
Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 1,221, roughly 7 times the size of Ross Creek; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.
In short: Aintree for rental income, Ross Creek for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.
Keep exploring
- National investment guide - top suburbs across every metric
- Take the suburb finder quiz - 5 questions to match your goals
- How our investment score works
- Property investment glossary - every term defined
Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs
Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.
Open interactive comparison