Skip to main content

Aintree vs Sawmill Settlement

Property investment comparison - Aintree, VIC 3336 vs Sawmill Settlement, VIC 3723

Head-to-head across core investment metrics: Aintree wins 1, Sawmill Settlement wins 4. The better choice depends on whether you're optimising for cash flow, growth, affordability, or liquidity, the table below highlights the winner on each metric.

MetricAintreeSawmill Settlement
Median house price$705K-
Median unit price$575K$545K
Gross rental yield (houses)3.98%-
Gross rental yield (units)2.49%7.70%
1-year house growth+1.1%+1.8%
3-year house growth-3.9%-5.9%
Vacancy rate14.5%1.8%
Population7,98286

Aintree vs Sawmill Settlement: what the numbers say

For units, Aintree sits at a median of $575K against $545K in Sawmill Settlement, which makes Sawmill Settlement the more affordable unit market and Aintree the pricier one.

Over the past year house prices moved +1.1% in Aintree and +1.8% in Sawmill Settlement, so recent momentum favours Sawmill Settlement, although both suburbs recorded growth.

Looking back three years, Aintree houses are -3.9% and Sawmill Settlement houses -5.9%, so Aintree has compounded faster than Sawmill Settlement over the longer window.

Rental vacancy is 1.8% in Sawmill Settlement and 14.5% in Aintree, so landlords in Sawmill Settlement face less competition for tenants. Anything under 2% is generally read as a tight market where tenants compete for homes.

Aintree is the bigger suburb, with a population of 7,982 against 86, roughly 93 times the size of Sawmill Settlement; a larger suburb usually means a deeper pool of buyers and tenants.

In short: Sawmill Settlement for recent price momentum, Sawmill Settlement for the tighter rental market. Which matters more depends on whether the investor is buying for cash flow, capital growth or affordability.

Keep exploring

Compare any 2-4 Australian suburbs

Build your own multi-suburb comparison with the full interactive tool.

Open interactive comparison